Adult and Pediatric Urology
There are a number of standard treatments for localized prostate cancer, including surgery, radiation treatments, and cryosurgery. There is still controversy over which treatment offers the best chance of curing prostate cancer, and each of the treatments carries certain risks. Balancing the chance for cure and the risks of the treatments is the difficult dilemma for men with prostate cancer, and the urologist’s job is to help each man find the treatement that will be best for him.
7 yr. results of surgery, radiation, and prostate seed implant for prostate cancer. BFR=per cent of men without cancerby PSA testing Time=months since treatment Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Jan 1;58(1):25-33.
There are no randomized trials comparing the standard treatments, but there is data available on thousands of patients treated with surgery, radiation therapy, radioactive seed implant, and cryosurgery. The study shown above is from 2004 and shows results from a single institution. This study found little difference in cure between the different treatments. On the other hand, a study published in 2009, analysing data on 8,321 men from multiple institutions, showed that men treated by external beam radiation had a nearly two-fold higher chance of dying of prostate cancer than men treated with surgery. Other studies show a high chance of long-term cure with prostate seed implant and prostate cryosurgery for most men. These studies, and others, show that all of the standard treatments have a good chance of curing prostate cancer when it has been caught early. A prostate treatment nomogram developed at Memorial-Sloan Kettering Cancer Center allows men to enter information about their cancer and predicts the chance of cure from each of the standard treatments. Men may click here to use the prostate treatment nomogram.
The difficult decision that patients have to make between treatment choices is not only about which treatment has the higher chance of cure, but is also about which risks the patient wants to take, how they feel about the various treatments, and how his overall health affects the treatment results. It is very important that patients understand that there are advantages and disadvantages, or risk and benefits of each of the standard treatments. Studies have shown that at least 90% of patients are satisfied with the treatment choice they make if they are adequately informed about the advantages and disadvantages of each. We feel that our role is to help each patient choose the treatment that is right for him.
The table below outlines the advantages and disadvantages of the standard treatments for localized prostate cancer. The treatment of advanced prostate cancer (cancer that has spread beyond the prostate and is detected in lymph nodes, bones, or other organs) usually starts with hormonal therapy. Click here to learn more about treatment of advanced prostate cancer.
| Treatment | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Observation |
|
|
| Surgery | ||
| Open radical retropubic prostatectomy |
|
|
| da Vinci prostatectomy (robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy) |
|
|
| Cryosurgery (freezing of prostate) | ||
| cryosurgery of entire prostate |
|
|
| focal cryosurgery (treatment of only area with cancer) |
|
|
| Radiation Treatments | ||
| External Beam Radiation |
|
|
| proton-beam external radiation |
|
|
| radioactive seed implant |
|
|
| high dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR) |
|
|
A man with localized prostate cancer has a difficult decision deciding which of the treatments is best for him. It is important to spend as much time as necessary to make the right decision, and some men may spend several weeks considering options and getting opinions from their urologist, radiation oncologist, friends, and family. Some of the more important elements in the decision making process are listed below.
Some patients feel strongly that they want surgery if they have cancer because they want the cancer “cut out” and feel uncomfortable with less invasive treatments. Other men decide they do not want surgery under any circumstance. Each man feels differently and it is important to listen to your “inner voice” regarding the treatments. Information from friends, relatives, and other sources is valuable but each man with prostate cancer should listen to his own “gut feelings” about the different treatments.
Different men value the advantages and disadvantages differently. For example, some men consider the small risk (5%) of incontinence after surgery to be fairly minor. Other men might feel that even the very small chance of incontinence after surgery is too risky for them. Some men who already have bowel problems might find the risk of intestinal side effects after radiation to be a serious consideration. Each men should consider the risks of each of the different treatments and try to determine which risks he feels comfortable taking before a decision is made.
Patient age can play a role in how patients recover from treatments. For example, men over 70 may recover slower from prostate cancer surgery than younger men. Men with serious heart or breathing problems are usually not good candidates for surgery. Men with less than 5 years of life left should strongly consider observation instead of treatment.
Men with moderate to severe urinary symptoms are often better off choosing surgery, because men urinate with a strong stream and less trouble after surgery. Men with small prostates and less symptoms will usually do well with any of the treatments, including laparoscopic surgery or cryosurgery. Men can click here to calculate the AUA Symptom Score, a standard way that urologists estimate the severity of a man’s urinary symptoms.
For some men the preservation of good sexual function is an important or primary goal, and may be a major factor in their decision about treatment. For other men who are not sexually active or are already impotent, the risk of impotence may play little or no role in their decision about treatment.